King County approves
Issaquah annexations
by Larry Johnson
You could call it a
slam-dunk or a love fest, but the King County Boundary Review Board called
it a unanimous vote to approve the annexation of Greenwood Point/South Cove
by Issaquah last week by giving preliminary approval to the annexation plan
without debate.
Formal board approval to
make the 402-acre, 3,000-resident unincorporated King County area part of the city is likely to
come in July, if nothing changes between then and last Wednesday’s public
hearing at the Holiday Inn.
Resident after resident
asked the board to let Issaquah annex their neighborhoods at the northwest
edge of Issaquah between Interstate 90 and Lake Sammamish.
Mostly, they said
annexation makes sense for both Issaquah and their neighborhoods.
Many residents said they
are willing to assume their share of the city’s bonded indebtedness to
accomplish the annexation, in large part because they believe they’ll get
better police protection, be able to vote and run for office here, and won’t
have to deal with King County government.
“We’re really wanting to
be part of Issaquah,” said Melody Scherting. “We subscribe to the Issaquah
Press, because that’s where local news is. We shop in Issaquah. We go out to
dinner in Issaquah. Our kids go to Issaquah schools. We rarely see the King County
police. Issaquah has better police protection.”
Long-time annexation
advocate David Bangs said a mailed survey returned by 475 of roughly 1400
potential respondents showed that 83 percent wanted to be annexed by
Issaquah, 6 percent wanted Bellevue, 6 percent wanted to stay in King County
and 5 percent didn’t know enough to express a preference.
Bangs, representing the
South Lake Sammamish Association, said Greenwood Point/South Cove residents
could run for office, see lower taxes, get police protection from Issaquah
rather than a King County
station in Maple
Valley, and would be willing to pay to be
part of the city.
“We want to take on our
share of Issaquah’s bonded indebtedness,” Bangs said. “We want to pay the
same as other Issaquah residents. It wouldn’t be fair not to.”
Eleanor May said
burglars recently attempted to enter her home.
“I want to be covered by
(Issaquah) police protection,” she said. “Not long ago, our home would have
been burglarized if not for our. . . alarm. Local police could come
quicker.”
Kevin Morgan said he had
tried to discuss speeding traffic in his South Cove neighborhood with the
county but got no action.
“I tried to work with King County on speeding through our neighborhood
to no avail. Issaquah has a smaller government, and our voices would be
heard,” he said.
Susie Carney said it’s
frustrating to shop in Issaquah and pay sales tax there, but get no direct
benefits from those payments.
Debbie Smith said that
several years ago, rumors were that Bellevue wanted to annex the area.
“ ‘Bellevue!’” I said. “ ‘ I don’t want to go to Bellevue!.’ ”
There’s a reason for
that, said Rod Putney
“We feel connected to
Issaquah,” he said. “When I drove here tonight to the meeting, it was 1.2
miles.”
Mayor Ave Frisinger
stressed that connection in the city’s presentation to the Boundary Review
Board.
“We view this annexation
area as part of Issaquah, and based on what we’ve heard, we believe the
residents do too,” she said.
Noting that Greenwood
Point/South Cove has been a potential annexation area of Issaquah since
1995, she said it is a logical place for Issaquah to extend city services.
“Our purpose is to be
responsive to residents, and be consistent with King County’s initiatives to get unincorporated
urban areas annexed to cities,” she said.
The county wants to pay
Issaquah $850,000 plus fund $1.1 million in
Issaquah-Fall City Road improvements if Issaquah
takes on Klahanie, a much larger neighborhood that the Boundary Review Board
approved for annexation by Issaquah last week, also on a preliminary basis.
Michael Thomas of the
King County Office of Management and Budget said no financial incentives
will be paid to Issaquah for annexing Greenwood Point/South Cove. He said
only the 10 biggest urban unincorporated areas come with incentives for the
cities who annex them.
Still, he said, the
county’s general fund will save $200,000 per year if the area is annexed.
“We don’t have the
ability to make everyone whole, or fully satisfied, or even partially
satisfied,” Thomas said.
Aside from one speaker
reading a letter too quickly for the court reporter who was recording the
meeting, about the only confusion at the meeting was about the effective
date of Issaquah police protection.
“The total annexation
package would take three years,” said Chief Dave Draveling. “Police
protection would be effective immediately.”
“That makes me feel a
lot better,” said Judy Tessendore, the review board member who was under the
impression that police protection for new neighborhoods would be three years
down the road.
Reporter Larry Johnson can be reached at
ljohnson @ isspress.com or at
392-6434, Ext. 234.